Skip to main content

Rescheduling tasks to the date you want

I was asked by someone recently to help them get their task to be scheduled on the date they wanted. One thing xProcess doesn't give you (except for overhead tasks whose size is defined by their duration rather than the estimated effort) is the ability to state when a task should start and stop. This is what the auto-scheduler does, based on your estimates, constraints (e.g. dependencies on other tasks or specific dates), your priorities and your available resources. So what if you have a task which is not being scheduled when you think it should?

Here's the checklist I gave my colleague:
  1. If the task being scheduled too soon you can add a constraint to the task by opening its editor (double-click) and selecting the “Constraints” where you can add the constraint (e.g. a dependency on another task or a “start after < date >” constraint).
  2. It may be though that the task is being scheduled too late and you want it scheduled sooner. A quick and easy way to achieve this is to make it “active” as then it will be scheduled immediately. (Just right-click on the task and select “Make active”. This can also be done from the web client too and it’s worth checking that the team always make the tasks they are working on active so that they are always scheduled immediately and not postponed when higher priority tasks are defined unless they make them inactive.)
  3. If it’s not currently being worked on (so not “active”), but you want it scheduled earlier (for example as soon as current active tasks are complete) then increase it's priority. Here's how:
  • If the task is not in the current sprint (assuming you're using the Scrum process) it will be scheduled after this sprint, so drag it into the current sprint from its current location
  • If it is in the current sprint but still not being scheduled soon enough, use the “Priorities” button on the tool bar, which takes you to the “priority groups” tab for the project. Maximize the window so you can see it all and select the current sprint. In the lower list you can see the relative priorities of all the tasks in the sprint. Change them so your task is near the top.
  • Check in the first tab of this window “All tasks in Schedule Order” that your task is high enough. (You will see for example all the active tasks near the top of this list.)
Finally one more thing to check. Make sure the task doesn't have constraints on it's start or end, for example a dependency on another task that won't complete for some time. This will also cause it to be scheduled later.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does your Definition of Done allow known defects?

Is it just me or do you also find it odd that some teams have clauses like this in their definition of done (DoD)?
... the Story will contain defects of level 3 severity or less only ... Of course they don't mean you have to put minor bugs in your code - that really would be mad - but it does mean you can sign the Story off as "Done"if the bugs you discover in it are only minor (like spelling mistakes, graphical misalignment, faults with easy workarounds, etc.). I saw DoDs like this some time ago and was seriously puzzled by the madness of it. I was reminded of it again at a meet-up discussion recently - it's clearly a practice that's not uncommon.

Let's look at the consequences of this policy. 

Potentially for every User Story that is signed off as "Done" there could be several additional Defect Stories (of low priority) that will be created. It's possible that finishing a Story (with no additional user requirements) will result in an increase in…

"Plan of Intent" and "Plan of Record"

Ron Lichty is well known in the Software Engineering community on the West Coast as a practitioner, as a seasoned project manager of many successful ventures and in a number of SIGs and conferences in which he is active. In spite of knowing Ron by correspondence over a long period of time it was only at JavaOne this year that we finally got together and I'm very glad we did.

Ron wrote to me after our meeting:

I told a number of people later at JavaOne, and even later that evening at the Software Engineering Management SIG, about xProcess. It really looks good. A question came up: It's a common technique in large organizations to keep a "Plan of Intent" and a "Plan of Record" - to have two project plans, one for the business partners and boss, one you actually execute to. Any support for that in xProcess?

Good question! Here's my reply...

There is support in xProcess for an arbitrary number of target levels through what we call (in the process definitions) P…

Understanding Cost of Delay and its Use in Kanban

Cost of Delay (CoD) is a vital concept to understand in product development. It should be a guide to the ordering of work items, even if - as is often the case - estimating it quantitatively may be difficult or even impossible. Analysing Cost of Delay (even if done qualitatively) is important because it focuses on the business value of work items and how that value changes over time. An understanding of Cost of Delay is essential if you want to maximise the flow of value to your customers.

Don Reinertsen in his book Flow [1] has shown that, if you want to deliver the maximum business value with a given size team, you give the highest priority, not to the most valuable work items in your "pool of ideas," not even to the most urgent items (those whose business value decays at the fastest rate), nor to your smallest items. Rather you should prioritise those items with the highest value of urgency (or CoD) divided by the time taken to implement them. Reinertsen called this appro…