Skip to main content

Two old friends ALF and BIRT

xProcess is an environment that covers a wide area since it is involved in all aspects of processes for projects. As a consequence it often overlaps or interacts with information that may be held in other tools or data sources. Its ability to integrate smoothly with information from elsewhere is a key to the products on-going success. There are 2 Eclipse initiatives that Ivis and the xProcess team are currently involved with, that will be bearing fruit in the product over the next few months. They are called ALF and BIRT.

ALF stands for the Application Lifecycle Framework. It's a Project is a subproject of the Eclipse Technology Project. Its purpose is to create a technology framework that will enable a diverse set of vendor tools, irrespective of architecture or platform, to exchange user data, manage business processes and collaborate in support the chosen ALM infrastructure technologies in use by development communities. After initial discussions with the ALF team (see Kevin Parker's Blog) we're expecting to be participating in the project and ensuring that xProcess is able to both generate ALF events and be called from ALF Service Flows. You can find out more about the ALF project from http://www.eclipse.org/alf/.

BIRT is an open source, Eclipse-based reporting system that produces compelling reports for both the web and printed formats. It provides core reporting features such as report layout, data access and scripting. It's integration with the next version xProcess means that it will be straightforward for customers to specific and generate their own documents and reports. BIRT's home page is at http://www.eclipse.org/birt/.

Both these projects will be represented at EclipseCon - an event where you'll also be able to meet the Ivis team of course, and see xProcess in action!

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does your Definition of Done allow known defects?

Is it just me or do you also find it odd that some teams have clauses like this in their definition of done (DoD)?
... the Story will contain defects of level 3 severity or less only ... Of course they don't mean you have to put minor bugs in your code - that really would be mad - but it does mean you can sign the Story off as "Done"if the bugs you discover in it are only minor (like spelling mistakes, graphical misalignment, faults with easy workarounds, etc.). I saw DoDs like this some time ago and was seriously puzzled by the madness of it. I was reminded of it again at a meet-up discussion recently - it's clearly a practice that's not uncommon.

Let's look at the consequences of this policy. 

Potentially for every User Story that is signed off as "Done" there could be several additional Defect Stories (of low priority) that will be created. It's possible that finishing a Story (with no additional user requirements) will result in an increase in…

"Plan of Intent" and "Plan of Record"

Ron Lichty is well known in the Software Engineering community on the West Coast as a practitioner, as a seasoned project manager of many successful ventures and in a number of SIGs and conferences in which he is active. In spite of knowing Ron by correspondence over a long period of time it was only at JavaOne this year that we finally got together and I'm very glad we did.

Ron wrote to me after our meeting:

I told a number of people later at JavaOne, and even later that evening at the Software Engineering Management SIG, about xProcess. It really looks good. A question came up: It's a common technique in large organizations to keep a "Plan of Intent" and a "Plan of Record" - to have two project plans, one for the business partners and boss, one you actually execute to. Any support for that in xProcess?

Good question! Here's my reply...

There is support in xProcess for an arbitrary number of target levels through what we call (in the process definitions) P…

Understanding Cost of Delay and its Use in Kanban

Cost of Delay (CoD) is a vital concept to understand in product development. It should be a guide to the ordering of work items, even if - as is often the case - estimating it quantitatively may be difficult or even impossible. Analysing Cost of Delay (even if done qualitatively) is important because it focuses on the business value of work items and how that value changes over time. An understanding of Cost of Delay is essential if you want to maximise the flow of value to your customers.

Don Reinertsen in his book Flow [1] has shown that, if you want to deliver the maximum business value with a given size team, you give the highest priority, not to the most valuable work items in your "pool of ideas," not even to the most urgent items (those whose business value decays at the fastest rate), nor to your smallest items. Rather you should prioritise those items with the highest value of urgency (or CoD) divided by the time taken to implement them. Reinertsen called this appro…